THE RESOLUTION OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DISPUTES THROUGH ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Keywords:
Access to Justice, Stakeholders Theory, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Multi Door Court HousesAbstract
The challenges of delay, cost and restrictive outcomes of litigation in Nigeria have made it largely
inadequate for the resolution of Corporate Governance Disputes (CGD). Previous studies focused
on Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) generally as a complement to litigation while glossing
over the suitability of ADR for specialized disputes in areas such as corporate governance. This
paper therefore, examines the potentials for the resolution of CGD through ADR, and the practice
and procedure of specific ADR methods for their resolution, in order to determine their adequacy
or otherwise.
This paper adopts the Access to justice and the Stakeholder’s theories for the resolution of CGD.
The research methodology adopted is doctrinal. Primary sources include the Constitution of the
Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 as amended, Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA), High
Court Civil Procedure Rules of Lagos State and the Federal Capital Territory, Federal High Court
Rules, National Industrial Court of Nigeria ADR Centre Instrument and Rules 2015, Court of
Appeal Rules and the National Code on Corporate Governance (NCCG) 2018. Decisions of
Nigerian and foreign courts, government reports and policies are also reviewed. Secondary data
including journal articles, legal texts, report of the British Council “Justice for All” Project,
newspaper reports, internet materials, and monographs are examined.
The advantages of ADR make it suitable for the resolution of CGD. ADR is applicable to the
resolution of CGD, such as, boardroom disputes, employee/employer, intra- employee disputes
and shareholder activism. As the Multi Door Court Houses are not widely used despite their
potentials, the resolution of Corporate Governance Disputes through Alternative Dispute
Resolution in Nigeria is underutilized. The guidelines for the resolution of corporate governance
disputes need to be reviewed to include the adoption of Alternative Dispute Resolution.