An Assessment of Claimants’ Experiences with Compulsory Land Acquisition and Compensation Practices in Ede, Osun State

Abstract

This study assessed claimants’ experiences with compulsory land acquisition and compensation
practices in Ede, Osun State, focusing on procedural participation, transparency, timeliness, and
socio-cultural and economic impacts. A survey research design was adopted, targeting 152
claimants affected by the Akoda–Cottage Junction–Timi Palace Junction road dualization project.
Using a census approach, structured questionnaires were administered to all claimants, with 146
valid responses retrieved (96.1% response rate). Data were analysed using descriptive and
inferential statistics in SPSS. Findings revealed high satisfaction in decision-making involvement
(91.1%), process timeliness (93.1%), compensation amount (89.8%), and asset enumeration
(88.4%). However, a major weakness emerged in compensation payment timelines, with 71.3%
dissatisfied. Socio-cultural and economic impacts were significant: 85.6% reported erosion of
cultural heritage, 89.7% loss of headship/goodwill, 93.8% disruption of livelihoods, and 98% loss
of communal ownership. Correlation analysis showed a strong positive relationship between
compulsory acquisition level and compensation practices (r = 0.762, p = 0.001) and between
acquisition level and influencing factors (r = 0.842, p = 0.010). The study concluded that while
procedural inclusivity and transparency were commendable, delays in compensation payments
undermined overall satisfaction and claimant welfare. It is recommended that compensation
disbursements be prompt, valuation methods broadened to capture socio-cultural losses, and
participatory decision-making strengthened through effective communication and administrative
efficiency. A holistic approach integrating financial adequacy, cultural sensitivity, and procedural
transparency is necessary to enhance fairness and legitimacy in compulsory land acquisition.